Teen Paul Krugman "Found Himself" in Science Fiction
Published March 30, 2009 @ 07:04AM PT

I love hearing what great adults say was the formative literature of their youth. Nobel Prize-winning economist and NYTimes columnist Paul Krugman tells his story in a great profile article on Newsweek:
Born of poor Russian-immigrant stock, raised in a small suburban house on middle-class Long Island, Krugman, 56, has never pretended to be in the cool crowd. Taunted in school as a nerd, he came home one day with a bloody nose—but told his parents to stay out of it, he would take care of himself. "He was so shy as a child that I'm shocked at the way he turned out," says his mother, Anita. Krugman says he found himself in the science fiction of Isaac Asimov, especially the "Foundation" series—"It was nerds saving civilization, quants who had a theory of society, people writing equations on a blackboard, saying, 'See, unless you follow this formula, the empire will fail and be followed by a thousand years of barbarism'."
His Yale was "not George Bush's Yale," he says—no boola-boola, no frats or secret societies, rather "drinking coffee in the Economics Department lounge." Social science, he says, offered the promise of what he dreamed of in science fiction—"the beauty of pushing a button to solve problems. Sometimes there really are simple solutions: you really can have a grand idea."
I admire Krugman's style on the bobblehead Sunday morning talk shows, the way he pwns sniffly George Will's whacked analyses so effortlessly, and holds Obama's and Geithner's feet to the fire as well. I admire him more now, knowing that he was nerdy, shy, and bullied as a kid.
And what does this say about our insistence on teaching the canonized classics in our English classes? Did they work for you? What did you read voluntarily as a teen? Reading Krugman's account made me remember my strange love affair with a weird fantasy series called The Chronicles of Gor. They weren't classics, but they kept me reading for 27 volumes. That's a hell of a booster for any kid's vocabulary, I have no doubt.
Call me crazy, but at 16, love him though I do now, I just wasn't into Billy Shakespeare.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Student: "What Should I Read?" Me: "Sedaris." You?
-
The "Twilight" of Serious Teen Reading?
-
What China Can Teach Writing Teachers
Comments (10)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















Most of my students are 17-19 years old. In one of my courses this term (an English course for Child Studies majors) I teach Salinger's Franny & Zooey as well as the first Harry Potter book. Invariably, most students love Harry Potter and detest Franny & Zooey. (Let's not get into the question of whether F&Z is a "canonical" work - some would say yes.)
A few classes ago, we had a long discussion about why, year after year, I make students read F&Z when they tell me, year after year, that they hate it. The students themselves came up with some very good reasons: "We're not reading for entertainment here;" "It's a challenge for us and so it helps us deal with texts we don't identify with right away;" "If I love something and it's easy, I don't need to read it in school - I can read it on my own." And so on.
Granted, for many students, school reading is the only reading they do, so I think there has to be a balance. But I also think it's important to ask students to grapple with texts they're not comfortable with; after all, dealing with something new and difficult is often at the heart of learning.
Posted by Siobhan Curious on 03/30/2009 @ 07:27AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
@Siobhan - "But I also think it's important to ask students to grapple with texts they're not comfortable with; after all, dealing with something new and difficult is often at the heart of learning."
--well-said. Ditto the "balance" point. (But I'm not sure I intended any argument for "easy" reading....)
Do you teach any sci-fi? And do your students mention any benefits of a class reading of something they love and "would read on [their] own"? Potter, e.g.?
Posted by Clay Burell on 03/30/2009 @ 07:47AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I don't teach sci-fi in this class. I teach Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go in another, but Ishiguro himself has argued that his novel is not sci-fi (I don't agree, but what do I know?)
The students' arguments for reading things they love aren't usually articulated beyond their general enthusiasm ("This book was great!") and their disdain for works they don't like ("I do not recommend that you teach this book next term.") I can certainly see the advantages, both for them and for me, for giving them works that they'll actually read and be excited about. So every term I try to put something in there that I think they'll glom onto, as well as something that they'll find more challenging.
(I have to note, too, that one reason I put F&Z on the syllabus is because there are always a few students that love it, and a few who tell me later that they came back to it when they were more ready for it. I always tell students this when we discuss my reasoning: you might not love it, but someone else did, and you might find that later in life you remember it and give it another try.)
Posted by Siobhan Curious on 03/30/2009 @ 07:56AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
When I was little (elementary school), I read mostly teen girl novels, and stuff like the Boxcar Children, Goosebumps, and Animorphs. I also read a lot of non-fiction from the library. When I was 11 my mom bought me Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, and that started my love affair with fantasy. The bulk of what I read to this day is fantasy, especially urban fantasy, though I try to mix it up with other genres every now and then. It's so very important for kids to read what they like. That's what led me to be the crazy, book-hoarding bibliophile I am today (600 books and counting, and I'm only 20).
Posted by Lianne Lavoie on 03/30/2009 @ 08:43AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Through a serendipitous series of searches this morning I stumbled on to your blog and have now whiled away several hours reading your posts and enjoying the comments - including all 185 of the Creationism/Evolution series. (Wow. Talk about the patience of Job.)
I think responding to a post about reading for pleasure is perfect.
I too, was raised in a bible-rich but literature poor southern home where reading was considered quite a "waste of time" second only to watching TV or listening to music, both of which were completely banned. For me, school assignments were both a pleasure and a curse. I kinda liked to read and having the homework excuse was great, unforetunately, I ended up with the next step on the creativity killer scale, horrible grades on my reports becuase, quite frankly, they sucked. I was one of those sad kids mentioned in some other post who lacked the ability to critique beyond the obvious. Back then I thought it was because I just didn't get it or was obviously stupid.
The light turned on one day in Ms. Unold's Eng. Lit. class in 1981 when we were assigned to read "To the Virgins to Make Much of Time" and write a one page report on the poems relevence to our lives. After listening to a considerable amount of nonsensical drivel from her backwards 15 and 16 year old students, the dear woman turned to the class, spread her arms to heaven and exclaimed "It's about sex! It's about getting it on! It's about 'what are you saving it for?' Are you seriously telling me that you don't see the relevence to your lives?!"
I re-read that poem, reead another, moved on to more varied types of literature, discovered Willie Shakespeare and the theatre, and eventually became an actress and a now, a writer. All because, I think, that sweet lady made a connection between sex and reading for pleasure. By the way, if I recall correctly, the same can be said - in spades - for the "Chronicles of Gor."
As a forty-something year old adult I now engage in pleasure reading where ever, and whenever, I find it and it has been a pleasure reading your blog today. Thanks and I'm sure I'll visit again!
Posted by Stasha Boyd on 03/30/2009 @ 03:19PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
My twelve year old is an avid reader and will read almost anything you give her. Her favorite book so far is Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins. http://www.scholastic.com/thehungergames/
I read it too, as I usually read all the books she purchases or brings home (we live across from the library), I'm not sure if it would be considered sci-fi as much as fantasy. I truly enjoyed the read though and the conversation about war and society that my daughter and I had as a result.
She is in 6th grade and her teachers are very creative and asked them to dress up like their favorite character from their favorite book and my daughter is going to be Katniss from Hunger Games. She's re-reading the book and really enjoying the project. My point is that a love of reading comes from reading books we love and not books we don't love. Unfortunately, all children will not love the same books so I really like the idea of allowing children to pick from a few books rather than a rigid curriculum.
Posted by Michele Rodriguez on 03/30/2009 @ 04:34PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
One of my favorite books in high school was Farenheit 451, which we read in sophomore English. I'd go on to read 1984 on my own, though for some inexplicable reason, I've never read Huxley's "Brave New World."
At the time, my "on my own" reading was comic books and things that related to comic books and sci-fi. Sometime around the sixth or seventh grade, I got really into the "Star Trek" novels as well as the first few "Star Wars" novels (Timothy Zahn's "Heir to the Empire" trilogy) as well as the serialized novels based on the "Robotech" series of my youth.
Then, of course, there were comics. I'd read "G.I. Joe" and "The Transformers" when I was 10 but what started my serious comic book addiction was the first Tim Burton "Batman" movie in 1989. Before I sold most of my collection to pay for an engagement ring, I'd accumulated a couple thousand comics. I still have a couple of boxes, including a pretty comprehensive "Teen Titans/New Titans" collection (I even had a few letters published).
I also remember that the moment I felt I was "old enough," I went right for Stephen King. My parents had been reading him like crazy all through the 1980s. My dad gave me his copy of "The Eyes of the Dragon" in the seventh grade and I read it and absolutely loved it. Then, I picked up the Dark Tower books (and stayed with them all the way until the seventh book came out).
My biggest accomplishment, however, was reading "It" in the eighth grade. This was around the time the miniseries with Tim Curry as Pennywise came out and my friends and I were reading the book in study hall and on the bus. Funny thing, you'd think someone would have said something because of how vulgar that book is, but no teacher ever said a thing. I remember feeling pretty big at the time because not only had I finished a book that was more than 1000 pages, I understood quite a lot of it.
I haven't had any students who have read much of King's stuff. I think that's due to it being a good 20 years since his heyday and because of the glut of teen-targeted books on the market. A couple of my students in past years read "The Shining" and one read "The Stand," only to get ticked off at the ending. Quite a few read comic books and so I can geek out with them every once in a while, and even bring some English to it since my last paper in college was titled: "The Perpetuation of Mythology in Modern Literature and Modern American Popular Culture" (read: 1/3 of the paper was Wonder Woman and the Greeks, Superman as a Christ figure, and Crisis on Infinite Earths as Revelation).
I'm actually looking forward to my next two books, though--"Lord of the Flies" and "All Quiet on the Western Front." Oh, and much of Willie Shakes is not for high schoolers, but I had success with "Macbeth" in 12th and my 10th is comparing "The Taming of the Shrew" and "10 Things I Hate About You." Good stuff ... so far.
Posted by Tom Panarese on 03/30/2009 @ 07:45PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I looooove Shakespeare. Not that I've read that much of it (only Macbeth, Othello, and A Midsummer Night's Dream, plus a few soliloquies). A Midsummer Night's Dream is my favourite. It's so funny once you learn to understand the language enough to get the jokes.
Posted by Lianne Lavoie on 03/31/2009 @ 07:06AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Great article, Clay. I love reading "great adult" stories like this as well.
My favorite novels when I was 17 were all written by Chuck Palahniuk, besides Jazz by Toni Morrison and House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski. I actually kept a journal during the month it took me to read House of Leaves (I started shortly after my 17th birthday) and wrote entries about my reactions to the book, and my experiences reading it. It was a great exercise that I think more high school English teachers should consider - of course you can only do it with an exceptional novel that is sure to catch a high school student's attention, and of course you don't need the extra stimulants I employed at the time to "inspire me," haha.
My younger brother, who was 15 at the time, read A Clockwork Orange at least five times during that period and it's still his favorite book. Before Palahniuk, I was all about Francesca Lia Block novels and anything written by a Beatnik (Kerouac, Ginsberg, Burroughs, Amiri Baraka, Diane DiPrima, etc). I particularly liked reading anything on the banned book list as well, haha. I used to wish there was an English course purely devoted to banned books.
Posted by D W on 04/01/2009 @ 10:59AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Ah, I love Isaac Asimov. He has largely shaped who I am today.
Posted by Tyler Kissinger on 04/03/2009 @ 05:29PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.