Education

Still Separate, Still Unequal? (An Introduction)

Published July 27, 2009 @ 11:09AM PT

Fifty-five years ago, the United States Supreme Court declared that providing “separate but equal” educational opportunities to students based on race denied students of color the equal protection of the law.  As Chief Justice Warren wrote:

To separate [elementary- and secondary-school children] from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone. We conclude that in the field of public education, the doctrine of 'separate but equal' has no place (Brown v. Board of Education, 1954).

Subsequent to that decision, though certainly not "with all deliberate speed," progress was made towards the goal of desegregating the public schools in the United States.  However, as documented by the Civil Rights Project, we are now a good decade or so into a period of rapid resegregation.  A 2003 report by the Civil Rights Project stated that 1 out of every 6 African-American children in the United States now attends a school where less than one percent of the population is white.  The table below is from the most recent report from the Civil Rights project.  The percentage of African-American students in predominantly (>50%) minority schools dropped from 77% in 1968 to 63% in 1988, but by 2005 the percentage had rebounded to 73%.  Today, nearly three out of every four African-American students in the U.S. attends a school that is majority-minority.  The rapid resegregation is most pronounced in the South.

Five years ago, at an event recognizing the 50th anniversary of the Brown decision, I had the honor of serving on a panel with Theodore M. Shaw, then the director-general counsel and president of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund (LDF).  Offering his take on the desegregation struggles, Shaw said something to the effect of "I'm tired of chasing white people."  Around the same time, the New York Times a interviewed Dr. Cornel West and Dr. Henry Louis Gates, Jr. (yes, THAT, Dr. Gates!).  Reflecting on the 50th anniversary of the Brown decision, Dr. Gates said:

What we're talking about really is how to deal with the conflict between quality and community. Many of our friends on the left would have us believe that all black people want their kids bused out of the inner cities. [But] what they want from busing is quality. If we could make predominantly black schools excellent, would that be a satisfactory goal? I say yes, because I don't think there's anything magic about being around white people. I think it's good for a multicultural society to have integration. But unless we have economic integration, we're not going to have residential integration. And unless the schools have quality, we're not going to have economic integration.

I distinctly remember struggling to wrap my head around what I was hearing and reading from prominent African-American scholars. I believed in the intangible benefits of integrated schooling and I was hopeful. Just one year earlier, the Supreme Court held that achieving student body racial diversity was a compelling governmental interest, at least in the law school context.

Then, two years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court effectively ended policy efforts to remedy or curb the resegregation of schools.  In a 5-4 decision in the case of Parents Inolved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 et al., the Court held that student assignment plans aimed at racial balancing were unconstitutional.  Some commentators have suggested that efforts to desegregate on the basis of race are not entirely impossible, pointing to Justice Kennedy's concurring opinion which suggested that race may be considered to ensure equal educational opportunity.  Yet, even the most adamant advocates for racial desegregation have a hard time getting past Chief Justice Roberts' proclamation that "[t]he way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race."

To that, CJ Roberts, I say, "right on!"  In fact, while much of the progress that was achieved by eliminating legally enforced (de jure) school segregation has been erased by de facto housing segregation patterns that beget de facto school segregation, it is also clear that students of color continue to be denied equal educational opportunities within the institution of schooling. That is, while the post-Brown focus was and continues to be between-school and between-district segregation by race, more subtle forms of racial discrimination have persisted and proliferated within schools and districts, even in the most “integrated” schools and districts.

In the coming days, I will be exploring issues of within-school segregation.  Specifically, I will be writing about:

  • The overrepresentation of students of color in special education (Tuesday)
  • The underrepresentation of students of color in gifted and talented programs (Wednesday)
  • The underrepresentation of students of color in STEM initiatives (Thursday)

On Friday, I plan to wrap it all up and offer critical commentary and policy recommendations.  I hope you'll join me for some courageous conversations about race and schooling.

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (9)

  1. Sidney Andrews

    Great post!  I go along with the belief that the integration of schools based on race is an impossible task when we have geography, class and other issues at play.  We are in the context of another time.  Back before the Brown decision, the only route of obtaining equivalent supplies and education was to fight to have Black students integrated into the same facilities as the majority students.  Now that we have more avenues and options, it may be better in our modern context to try and work for equivalent facilities and supplies as opposed to sharing.  

    Unfortunately, that too is a fight that we're losing so far...

    Posted by Sidney Andrews on 07/27/2009 @ 12:20PM PT

  2. Ira Socol

    Though I am convinced that we can't fix education without fixing poverty - that is - in a capitalist system people in poverty will always have less power than people with money, and that is guaranteed to produce unequal educational results - I also feel that the true need to create truly excellent neighborhood public schools for everyone.

    I attended high school in the first "northern" US city to go through court-ordered desegregation. Until that point, that city school district had 12 elementary schools (in a 10 square mile city), 2 junior highs (geographically split), and 1 general high school (90% white) and one Vocational high school (90% black). Of the elementaries, 10 were almost entirely white, 1 entirely black, and one, serving the rare NY metro integrated area, was integrated. The court decision found that the boundaries of the "Lincoln School" had steadily been redrawn to turn it into an overcrowded, all black school.

    The city's solution was to demolish Lincoln School

    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,870332,00.html

    then merge the high schools, then offer "Lincoln District" parents their choice of any other school in the city.

    This created interesting situations. All white city children walked to their K-6 neighborhood schools. Almost all black city children climbed aboard school busses every morning to ride to neighborhoos they really could not participate in. The city's elementaries strongly reflected their ethnic neighborhoods - 3 were indistinguishable from the Catholic schools which also served dominantly Italian neighborhoods - the 4 schools in the city's dominantly Jewish/Episcopalian "north end" (famous as "Rob Petrie" country) were highly competitive academic workshops. The Irish neighborhood schools tended to be more liberal, even experimenting with open classrooms very early on.

    But the black neighborhoods had no school, no place where their choices might dominate.

    This is complicated, because new opportunities certainly became available to African-American students through this desegregation plan, yet, the key opportunity - the chance to build a great neighborhood school, was denied.

    It is this background which leads me to oppose Charter Schools as a systemic solution. Transported children are at disadvantages, neighborhood schools are a much better solution. And so the essential facts are that we need to reverse the US school money concept where the most cash flows to the kids with the fewest needs, and we must insist on creative community-based schools with real choices in every building.

     

    ... and being a "special ed is for every student" kind of guy, I'm waiting to see tomorrow's post...

    Posted by Ira Socol on 07/27/2009 @ 02:16PM PT

  3. Dan McGuire

    I'm becoming more convinced that our large urban districts are a big part of the problem.  The facts about what gets spent for each kid and who's teaching each kid get lost in the jungle of our urban school bureaucracies.

    Also, we need to talk about all of the dollars that get spent on each child's education.  That means including the money that parents spend on extra-curricular activities, health care, nutrition. and out of school child care - they're all necessary to an education.  If we balance all of those things, we'll be on our way to actually doing something about the disparities that exist.

    So, we can start by saying school districts can have no more than 10,000 students each.  That should also get rid of some of the big buck administrative jobs.

     

     

    Posted by Dan McGuire on 07/27/2009 @ 02:48PM PT

  4. Jon Becker

    Dan, it's interesting that you went from my post to "urban school bureaucracies."  The problem of segregation by race are not just an urban issue.  In fact, Long Island (NY) is one of the most segregated statistical metropolitan areas in the country.  There, local control has run amok.  There are 125 separate school districts just on Long Island, each paying an average of $250,000 to a superintendent.  Furthermore, if I remember correctly, 90% of the African-American students on Long Island are served by less than 10 (less than 10%) of the districts.

    Segregation of schools is a complicated issue, and I don't see large urban school bureaucracies as related to that issue.

    Posted by Jon Becker on 07/28/2009 @ 12:38PM PT

  5. Rich Haglund

    Dan:

    Last year, Nashville went through a rezoning process that, depending on choices students and families made, could lead to more segregated student bodies at some schools.  Something that was never discussed at the time, in meetings or in the media, was the fact that the poor and minority students who were being bused to schools in wealthier areas, were not doing well in thier schools far from home. Those schools, in fact, had lower value-added scores than some of the schools that served almost entirely poor and minority students.  That data was easily available in the state report card online, but it was never discussed in the media.

    I wished that the uproar had been over the lack of quality teachers and the right resources for all students.  That's what Brown v. Board was about.  My wife and I were glad that our son's elementary school class was diverse in many ways, but we were much more concerned with the quality of teaching he had access to.

     

    Posted by Rich Haglund on 07/28/2009 @ 02:09PM PT

  6. Dan McGuire

    Rich,

         I think your observation of Nashville supports my contention.  I only have personal expereince in Minneapolis where I now teach and in St. Paul where I lived for a while. My few years in New England only gave me a superficial understanding of Boston.  I know nothing about Long Island - I had dinner at my neice's in Queens a few years back, have been to JFK and LaGuardia a few times, but I hardly think that qualifies me to say anything about Long Island. (If you go to Brooklyn and Queens have you really been to Long Island?)  In general, I've found Long Island hard to get to, hard to get out of, and generally not very representative of mainland USA.

    Growing up in South Dakota taught me almost nothing about integration or segregation, unless you want to talk about real segregation - the reservation kind. 

    I really appreciated reading the story, though, about Ira's New Rochelle in 1963, which I've only seen from the train on my one trip through.  I think I'll post a link to it on the Minneapolis_Parents Forum web site where the strategic plan to fix the Mpls schools is sort of being discussed.  We don't use the term, Negroe, much anymore, but not a whole lot else has changed, it seems.

    Posted by Dan McGuire on 07/28/2009 @ 09:09PM PT

  7. Juan Sebastian Suarez

    I think that there is a period where it's better to separate for instance boys and girls since when 11-13 girls' tend to learn faster while boys are still slow, I've worked as a teacher and that's why I say it. but a complete isolated educational process is really dangerous to develop social interactions.

    Posted by Juan Sebastian Suarez on 07/30/2009 @ 08:26PM PT

  8. Joshua Alexander

    Will the Mayor get his sons’ uniforms from the new store that wants to cater to DC Schools?
    DC’s First School Uniform Store to Open August 10, 2009

    DC’s Mayor is making good on his promise to send his sons to public school this fall. And when classes begin, the boys, along with 45,000 other DCPS students, will need new uniforms. Earlier this year, guidelines were laid out for a more stringent uniform policy—which studies have shown to improve student discipline, attendance and retention—but in the past parents usually had to venture out to Maryland to purchase the mandatory attire.
     
    Enter Octavia Taylor Jackson, a mother of three young boys who attend DC public schools. After a layoff in late March, she put into motion a plan she had begun working on months before. Jackson, a native Washingtonian, has held well-paying jobs in the government, corporate and nonprofit sectors, but found her calling in entrepreneurship. Her passion for education and seeing children succeed in school pushed her to create Y.E.S.S.S. (Your Educational Supplies, Systems and Services), a school uniform and educational supply store that also provides consulting for information technology systems and related services for schools.
     
    In a period of only four months, Jackson—whose last job was Senior Vice President for Information Technology at an educational nonprofit—located a venue, hired contractors, ordered inventory, found employees and is hosting the grand opening of her new store at 108 Rhode Island Avenue, NW on Monday, August 10. Just in time for the back-to-school season.
     
    Asked about the reason for her new venture, Jackson states, “I remember several PTA meetings where I would commiserate with other parents over our frustration in finding school uniforms and supplies right here in DC. The tax free weekend wasn't beneficial when I had to go out to Maryland to find uniforms for my children who attend DC public schools. I started the company because I enjoy working with children and saw the need in my community for a store that sells school uniforms and supplies. I believe that this company is my destined career for the rest of my work life.”
     
    Y.E.S.S.S. (Your Educational Supplies, Systems and Services) is the preeminent provider of educational resources that students need to complete their education with the highest level of success.  The company caters to the academic community by offering a full-scale product line of school supplies, from uniforms to books and backpacks; along with consulting for information technology systems and related services. For more information, visit www.theyesss.com or call (202) 525-4157.

    Posted by Joshua Alexander on 08/06/2009 @ 02:59PM PT

  9. Dale Weston

    Very informative and relavent !

     

    Posted by Dale Weston on 11/17/2009 @ 01:00PM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author
Jon Becker

Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Leadership, Virginia Commonwealth University. WEB: http://jonbecker.net BLOG: http://edinsanity.com

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.