Reality-Based Sex Education: What a Concept
Published March 04, 2009 @ 07:28AM PT

Quotable:
Conservatives say teaching sex education in the public schools will promote promiscuity. With our education system? If we promote promiscuity the same way we promote math or science, they’ve got nothing to worry about. -- Beverly Mickins
But that doesn't stop Texas state legislators Sen. Ron Ellis and Rep. Joaquin Castro from trying to roll more enlightenment into Texas classrooms (Ellis is the lawmaker who co-sponsored a bill to rein it the creationist Texas Board of Education with an oversight law - sign the petition to thank him if you haven't already).
Ellis and Castro are calling for changes in the (almost) Abstinence-Only sex education taught in Texas classrooms.
According to the current law governing sex education in Texas schools, teachers must emphasize abstinence above all other methods of birth control. If passed, the Education Works Act would remove this section from the current law. (source)
{snip}
If passed, the bill would require Texas public schools that teach sex education to present students with medically accurate, age-appropriate information about sexually contracted infections and contraception, the bill’s authors said.
“Only through information will teens have the tools they need to make responsible decisions,” Ellis said. “It is true that abstinence is the only 100-percent way to avoid STIs and pregnancy, but experience has also taught us that abstinence from education does not work.”
Hear, hear. Reality-based education in Texas. What a concept.
Want more proof of that reality? From the same article:
The state of Texas has the highest teenage pregnancy rate in the country. Every 1,000 girls between the ages of 16 and 19 in Texas, 63 will become pregnant, said Austin gynecologist Diana Wise.
And if the following research is anywhere close to accurate, the reality is that abstinence has not been realistic for decades. Not only do birds and bees do it - so did Ozzie and Harriet, Ward and June:
The vast majority of Americans have sex before marriage. A 2006 study by the Guttmacher Institute found that 95 percent of Americans engage in pre-marital sex. As Guttmacher put it, the practice is "nearly universal among Americans and has been for decades." The "abstinence-until-marriage" message is completely disconnected from reality,
Texas spent $18 million spreading the "abstinence-only" message in 2007. It's not working. The state has one of the highest teen birth rates in the nation and, according to TFN, spends $1 billion annually on the costs associated with teen pregnancy.
I wish Texas - and indeed the entire nation - had a sex education policy that was based in the real world. Alas, it appears that won't be arriving any time soon. The federal 2009 Omnibus Appropriations bill is out. It allocates $94 million for more "abstinence-only" programs.
I'm tempted to write another "Thank you" petition to Sen. Ellis, but fear the 1,400 or so in the last week from you good folks are already swelling his inbox and, I hope, his head. It's nice to see such a strong supporter of education in Texas.
Parents who prefer life on De Nile, by the way, can opt opt their children out of the course proposed in Texas.
How about your neck of the woods? Is abstinence still the gospel in your schools? Any signs of change?
Related Posts
-
Opting In to Open-Minded Learning: A Fantasy
-
Dictionary Definitions: Too Sexy for Schools?
-
Learning Styles Theory Is Bunk
Comments (4)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Email


Perhaps the Texax Board of Education would like to be apprised of a forthcoming Vatican conference to "examine the compatibility of creation and evolution."
Here's the BBC link - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7920205.stm
Seems Pope John Paul II even said "evolution was (is) more than a hypothesis."
Posted by Lawrence Koss on 03/06/2009 @ 10:58AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Note on context: I live in Canada.
I started sex ed in grade 5, going all the way up to grade 12. We were taught all about STIs (or STDs as they were then called), and different methods of contraception, and by high school were being showed graphic images of genital warts to scare us. It was also repeatedly said throughout that abstinence is the only 100% guarantee of protection. Maybe my generation (I'm only 20 now) was just innocent, but it seemed to work for us. I definitely don't think that abstinence alone should be taught, but I do think it needs to be emphasized that that is the only guarantee. It's important that kids know that, because some of them will be smart enough to take that advice. Even if they aren't waiting till marriage, at least they might wait until they're with someone they care about, and they're old enough to be responsible.
I swear I'm not in the religious right, I'm just saying what worked for me...
Posted by Lianne Lavoie on 03/09/2009 @ 09:50AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Lianne,
You're lying. You're an End-Times type and you know it.
Just kidding.
I hear you and don't mean to denigrate the common sense advice that nobody will get knocked up or diseased if they keep their pants on. It's just that stopping there is an ideological decision that will affect a lot of tweens and teens who don't follow that advice, and could use some knowledge of Plan B, C, and D to avoid those undesired consequences. (Not that they'll necessarily work either, of course.)
Posted by Clay Burell on 03/09/2009 @ 10:14AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Agreed, of course.
Posted by Lianne Lavoie on 03/10/2009 @ 07:31AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.