Dear Auntie Siobhan: My Administration Won't Support Me or My Class Rules
Published July 22, 2009 @ 06:31AM PT
![]()
Auntie Siobhan is taking time away from her regular blog, Classroom as Microcosm, to answer teachers' questions. Today: how can I be a good teacher if I can't uphold my principles?
Dear Auntie Siobhan,
I teach at a college where I have had disciplinary problems with many of the students. In particular, I had a student who failed to come to class for two weeks (he went on vacation) then showed up to hand a paper in two weeks late. I did not accept the paper as per my late policy. This student then came to my office and would not take “no” for an answer. He would not leave my office when I told him I would not accept the paper, and then, after I’d left for the day, he slipped the paper to another teacher to place on my desk.
Because of the zero I gave him, this student failed my course, at which point he became more irrational than ever. He wrote me several emails telling me I had promised to let him rewrite the paper, that I would pass him, etc. I told the student I was sorry that there seemed to be a misunderstanding, but he was not going to “rewrite” the paper after term had ended. By this point, too, I had submitted the final grades to the college.
The student wrote back and basically called me a liar. I could not have submitted the grades, he claimed, and he demanded that I grade a revised paper by him.
I was deeply disturbed by this exchange and felt I needed back up. On the advice of a colleague, I copied my reply to this student to the chair of my department, outlining the truth of my statement and that the matter was now closed.
I heard no more from this particular student, but the chair basically told me that I was too hard on the students—my late policies, which teach the students preparedness for university (which I understood was my job) caused too much conflict. The message I seemed to receive from the chair was to give in to these irrational and irresponsible students rather than hold to my convictions.
After this episode I am left feeling deflated and as though I am at odds not just with the students but with the faculty and administration as well. I do not feel supported, nor do I feel I can live up to my own principles as an educator in this system.
I know that I face certain challenges as a teacher which could be the root of this dilemma: I am not a young or inexperienced teacher, but I look young. I am also a woman. Nevertheless, this episode has left me with a bad taste in my mouth.
Do you have any advice as to how to deal with situations like this? How can one educate students when one is not encouraged or supported to adhere to one’s principles?
Sincerely,
D for Deflated
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Dear Deflated:
This is indeed a troubling situation, and you're not alone in it. Many teachers feel that when it comes to setting limits for students, they don't receive much support. I have heard many stories about teachers who, when trying to enforce their classroom policies or to discipline students for inappropriate behavior, have been told by administrators that they need to lighten up, that the situation is their fault, or that they just need to handle the problem on their own.
We can't necessarily change others' attitudes or demand the respect we need in these circumstances, but there are some things we as teachers can do, both in advance and in the moment, in order to make such situations as easy on us as possible.
1. Determine whether your school has set or recommended policies concerning student behavior.
If your school already has policies in place about accepting late assignments, student attendance, etc., it's essential to know what these are. This is one way to establish support for yourself - you can simply direct the student and the administration to these policies and point out that by enforcing them, you are only doing what you've been told to do. Most colleges have some sort of handbook outlining student and teacher responsibilities.
However, it's not always possible to find all this information in one place, and not all problems are covered by such policies. That's where #2 comes in.
2. Run your classroom rules by an administrator or senior colleague before communicating them to your students, and ask for advice.
There are two main advantages to doing this. One is that your confidant can point out any places where you might run into trouble, and any rules that might be difficult to enforce; he/she might also be able to suggest areas where you could try to be flexible or more strict. The second is that if you do this, you will already have a supporter in your camp. If an administrator has collaborated with you on your policies, that administrator may be willing to go to bat for you if problems arise.
3. Set your policies out very clearly in your course outline, review them carefully with your students at the beginning of the term, and refer students back to them immediately when they contravene them.
I expect you did this, but it bears mentioning: students don't usually remember policies communicated orally. There needs to be a written document that they can be directed to if they question your rules. Set everything down on paper, and upload the course outline if you have an online classroom or class website. Finally, produce the paper for the administrators who question you, demonstrating that there was no reason for the student to misunderstand what was expected.
4. Communicate with an administrator or senior colleague as soon as a serious problem arises, and ask for advice.
This has advantages similar to #2. A confidant may genuinely be able to give you good advice about whether you should use a lighter hand in a particular situation, but perhaps more importantly, you will have implicated that person in the outcome; he or she may be more willing to support you when things get out of hand if you have approached him/her about the problem already.
For example, let's say you visit your department chair and say, "A student has just handed in a paper two weeks late. I have clearly indicated on my course outline that I don't accept papers more than a week late. What should I do?"
The chair might say, "The student knows your policy, and he'll just have to suck it up and take the consequences," and then you can refer back to this conversation later if the problem escalates.
Or the chair might ask, "Well, can you compromise? Can you give the student a severely reduced grade - say, a 30% for having submitted the paper, no feedback, and zero tolerance for the rest of the semester?" (I sometimes do this.) And you can discuss whether this is acceptable to you, and perhaps you can come to some sort of understanding about whether the chair will support you if there are further problems.
The point is to get people in your corner the moment you smell an issue.
There is another possible positive outcome of communicating about this at an early stage: after discussing the problem, you can, as you did in this case, cc the administrator on any further email communications. As you saw, this is often enough to make an irrational student back off.
It's easy for teachers to feel alone, and lonely, when students are causing big problems. It's also natural to feel hesitant about discussing these problems with others, especially people like administrators, who may have both a stake in our success and a say in whether we get re-hired.
The truth is, though, airing our problems can actually increase others' respect and support for us, because it shows we have the self-confidence to consult our colleagues, and enough trust in them to consider their suggestions.
None of the moves I outline above will guarantee unconditional support, but they can increase the chances that someone will get your back in a stressful situation.
*
Readers: Do you agree with this advice? Have you had trouble getting support from your administration when dealing with uncooperative or irrational students? What did you do? Please share your thoughts!
If you have a question about teaching for Auntie Siobhan, please send her an email at siobhancurious@gmail.com, or visit her blog, Classroom as Microcosm.
Image by Craig Jewell
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Dear Auntie Siobhan: She Won't Come to Class, but She Won't Leave Me Alone!
-
Dear Auntie Siobhan: Why Are All My Students Cheating?
-
A Bevy of 21st C. Learning Blogs
Comments (7)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















I am wondering what the attendance policy is at this school. My college had a policy that if you missed a week's worth of classes you were dropped. But other schools say you can't hold attendance against the student.
I have a friend who teaches in Japan and had this problem. When she first started teaching, her classes were set up so that they students had to take two tests and pass with 60% (she took over mid-year). Now she grades them on their daily participation and makes sure that daily assignments are worth more than two tests. You can work the system if you know the rules.
Posted by marcelle qb on 07/22/2009 @ 10:42AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Marcelle:
It sounds like attendance wasn't at the crux of the issue here, but the late paper. If the student could be failed for non-attendance, this problem would certainly be simpler.
Like your friend, I have weighted my assignments in order to encourage attendance, punctuality etc. However, if my administration were to decide that one of my policies was too harsh, I would be in a tough spot.
Posted by Siobhan Curious on 07/22/2009 @ 12:20PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
There are all kinds of irrationalities - and perhaps one is the "drop dead" assignment deadline. Is there a firm reason for this? Semester is ending and grades must be in? Even then...
So, I begin there. A learning environment must be about the student - who is the "customer" of this enterprise. Negotiations regarding "required" work almost always seem appropriate.
While I am certainly sensitive to the "teacher"s ability to run their course - in secondary or further ed students do not have the choices they have in tertiary environments, and so the meeting of individual student needs - even those which might offend a teacher's "Protestant work ethic" - "He went on vacation"!! - seems essential.
Still, the bigger issue here is a lack of a coherent educational environment in this school. Some here might side with the teacher. I side with the student. But a successful learning environment has a mediation system which is fair to all.
Posted by Ira Socol on 07/22/2009 @ 11:30AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Ira:
I can't speak for this teacher's deadline rationale, but I can tell you mine. It's multifold. First, in order to make progress in a course, my students must complete assignments in a timely manner, because assignments build on one another. Second, grading stray assignments is often difficult for me, just as integrating late material will be difficult for the people they work for someday. Finally, and most importantly, giving someone an extended deadline when other students have worked hard to complete their work on time is unfair.
I agree that the learning environment must be about the student, but I have always felt that the trope of student as "customer" is misleading. Students (or their parents, or the government) are not paying schools to pander or babysit. Students are not paying teachers to allow them to do whatever they want and then give them the grades they feel they deserve. (If they think that's what they're paying for, then they have not thought carefully about what school is.) Teachers are being paid to create an environment in which learning can take place, and part of the bargain is trusting that teachers have the expertise to do that, regardless of whether the students agree with their methods.
This doesn't mean that students have no right to question teachers. However, if a teacher sets out class guidelines at the beginning of the semester, the time for a student to discuss/disagree with them is at the beginning of the semester, when the student still has the opportunity to leave the course.
Posted by Siobhan Curious on 07/22/2009 @ 12:32PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
@ Ira
If the focus of the course is actually on student learning then every effort should be made to make sure the student learns and completes the work. Better late than never I imagine.
What always strikes me as entertaining as a school administrator is handing out contracts for the next school year. I always give my teachers a week or so to turn them in.
Earlier in the year a certain teacher had flunked a student who had failed to turn in their paper before the semester deadline. The student later finished the paper and the teacher and I went round and round about whether the grade should be changed.
Back to contract time. Wouldn't you know it that teacher forgot to turn their contract in by the deadline. Being the smart ass that I am when they came to turn it in I informed them the position has been posted and they would have to reapply for having missed the deadline.
After their look of pure horror I explained my point. I don't think I'll have to worry about dealing with this teacher and late assignments again.
Posted by Charlie Roy on 07/22/2009 @ 05:16PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Siobhan, Charlie:
Education is either about "training" or its about "learning." In the early university model students hired tutors to help them learn. In our Industrial Model of today we force students to school to train them to perform as compliant workers. So, to me, yes, students must be the customers.
And for me, one of the things which makes school a complete failure for so many students is the school/teacher imposed "learning schedule." From the notion of age-based grades, to the academic calendar, to the class schedule, we try to force our time table of "teaching" onto students as if that has anything to do with their time table for learning.
I do understand that things build on things, but I also understand that no two humans will construct that learning at the same rate - so a schedule created for a group will inevitably leave the large majority either bored or behind.
This is why we so need fundamental change. We are not babysitters, we - inheritors of the Prussian Model - http://education.change.org/blog/view/counting_the_origins_of_failure - are workers in a stamping plant, forcing students into shape - as Siobhan suggests - so they will be better employees.
Is that our job? It is if industry and capital are our employers and students are raw materials to be processed. But if our students are our customers, individual learners needing to be guided, then the concept of the rigid deadline disappears - unless it is the student who needs that.
Note - I still hate semesters and their deadlines. Why is my paper finished because you need to read it? Why should I "move on" in my learning because the calendar says December or May? It is a ridiculous concept.
Posted by Ira Socol on 07/22/2009 @ 07:13PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Ira,
You have a romantic idea about learning. In fact, I'd say that your ideas about education are recent, 20thC ideas, because before then, only the idle rich could learn for no reason other than to amuse themselves. Students are not customers unless they are going to a private school. Otherwise, taxpayers are investing in their education to produce a useful member of society. It was the only reason the public school system was created.
Education is about training. Always has been. It was the entire reason for it's creation. You want to be a painter in the 15thC? You get trained in the craft of painting by apprenticing. You get paid by a patron and you produce on time or you don't get paid. Either you followed your parent and did what they did or you apprenticed. If you couldn't produce, you washed out, your parents were in debt.
Deadlines have always existed. They're called seasons. If you didn't get your work done according to the seasons you were in trouble. Up until the 1980s, when farms became more mechanized, children needed to be out of school to work the farms - it's the only reason there is even a summer break in the school year.
I don't deny that our current education system (in the US) is to make better workers; it's why we've gotten rid of the arts in many schools and push math scores. But I can send my kid to an arts school where they still have to meet deadlines because a Thanksgiving play is pretty stupid in February.
Posted by marcelle qb on 07/23/2009 @ 08:56AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.