Education

Closure of Schools in Chicago May Have Led to Teen Violence

Published October 07, 2009 @ 04:37PM PT

Education Secretary Arne Duncan and Attorney General Eric Holder have been sent by President Obama to Chicago to address teen violence, following the death of a 16-year-old sophomore. The President has also asked for $25 million for crime-prevention. Some fear that the closure of a dozen Chicago schools has exacerbated the gang problem. Arne Duncan responded with cliches: "This is a fork in the road, this is a line in the sand, and we need to get dramatically better."

Jim Horn at Schools Matter has more on the link between the closure of schools and subsequent increase in teen violence. Most worrying is that money has been thrown at this problem before: "$60 million over 2 years for a data system and intervention program to identify and assist 10,000 of over 400,000 Chicago school students."

Photo credit: Doug Siefken

Share this Post

Comments (4)

  1. Linda Brown

     

    Stop blaming “Society” and the “Government” for what has happen in Chicago. It is happening everywhere in America. Only the parents of these children know what they have been taught. A child learns what he lives and it begins at home. Sure parents have to work but there should still be rules to follow. Go into your child’s room and make sure there is nothing in your house that wasn’t purchased by you or your child’s allowance. If that child is not at home at a certain hour, go look for him/her. I parents stop trying to have things (buying Xbox, Ipods, etc…) and focus on raising an ethical well nourished, well behaved child, the violence in many of our neighborhoods would decrease. If many stop running up in the four walls of the “Church” and talk to your children, use the rod of correction, our wardens at the jails and detention centers won’t have a job to do. The Violence Stops At Home!

     

    Posted by Linda Brown on 10/08/2009 @ 02:01PM PT

  2. William Newman

    Hi Linda:

     

    The government has great responsibility and this should never be forgotten nor discounted, but our government is dysfunctional at best and criminal at its worst. Yet, who's responsible for what the government has become? As we have, ostensibly, a government of the people, yes, society is responsible. In addition to our duties as citizens in a democracy, we must remember and take very seriously our shared obligations to one another. Yet, society is as faceless as government and as difficult to pin down and shake a finger at, isn't it?


    You want someone tangible to blame, and you name the family -- especially parents -- as the main culprits in this problem. You give us that old saw of the stern Protestant, "Spare ye not the rod lest ye spoil the child" -- apparently in all sincerity -- even as you loudly proclaim, "The violence stops at home!" Indeed. You further suggest that parents are solely responsible for disciplining, protecting, nurturing, educating, and inspiring their children whatever the circumstances. Yes, I could agree with much of this, in a perfect, middle-class, dream world. Yet, ever more families, especially in inner cities, are fractured and weak and many have been descending into the grim gutters of society for generations. Parental lessons in ethics and morality, traditionally passed down to children in functioning family and home environments have long been lost. With the loss of traditional family-centered home environments there is little hope for the fairy tale parenting you describe, rod or no rod. So, if a safe and nurturing home environment is not available, who is responsible?


    Increasingly, many parents have little education and no parenting skills, may have had negative experiences growing up themselves, or perhaps even have developed serious psychological-emotional pathologies. "Parents", often means just one mother struggling for survival for herself and her kids and, if she is fortunate enough to have work, may be working two jobs for 12 or more hours a day, yet with an income that doesn't cover the basics for survival. Depending on her particular history and situation, some of these seriously embattled mothers might see no choice but to sell their bodies or deal drugs to make the bitter ends meet, or may choose to associate with a strong but potentially harmful male figure in the community in order to obtain a feeling of security in her life. All of these, and much more than I can name here are daily realities for many of the families and parents you feel should shoulder the entire responsibility for society's lost children.

     

    Linda, however emotionally sincere you may be, you haven't got a clue how the disenfranchised underclasses must live. Try volunteering in an inner city neighborhood for awhile. If you last a year -- even a few months -- I'll be more open to what you might have to say. As you wrote, "This problem is happening everywhere in America," so there should be no problem finding a neighborhood in need of your help. Till then, enjoy your middle-class fantasy world while you still have it.

     

    Well, this blog post is quickly turning into an essay. I've had to trim it to a fraction of what I've written, which was hard because there truly is so much more to this story. I feel this short bit raises too many questions that are left unanswered, but it can't be helped: time to post!

     

    Ta-ta! William

     

    Posted by William Newman on 10/11/2009 @ 08:27AM PT

  3. Reply to thread
  4. Linda Brown

     

    Thank you for responding. Your comment is sensible to some. I am sure not to all.

    My mother was a single parent of six children. I am the single parent of seven grown children (endured childhood molestations, rapes and other forms of mental illness). I did not sell my body or do drugs just to make ends meet not did my mother. I was not easy for my mother or me. We used what we had (in other words, “We made do”). My mother worked two jobs at times and made sure that we were in a child’s place. When she couldn’t afford us clothes from the store, she made them. When there was not enough food, she grew a garden. As a single parent, you learn to be resourceful and not the unthinkable. It is about what you can do without and the respect one has for themselves and their children and others. Society said that to discipline my children is “Child Abuse”. I say that America’s juvenile justice is beyond abuse. It doesn’t matter how many generations past one has to look back and see where the failures begin at home. The parent or caregiver is a child’s first idol.

     

    Posted by Linda Brown on 10/11/2009 @ 03:27PM PT

  5. Mino D

    Child buttock-battering vs. DISCIPLINE:

    Child buttock-battering for the purpose of gaining compliance is nothing more than an inherited bad habit.

    Its a good idea for people to take a look at what they are doing, and learn how to DISCIPLINE instead of hit.

    I think the reason why television shows like "Supernanny" and "Dr. Phil" are so popular is because that is precisely what many (not all) people are trying to do.

    There are several reasons why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea. Here are some good, quick reads recommended by professionals:

    Plain Talk About Spanking
    by Jordan Riak,

    The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children
    by Tom Johnson,

    NO VITAL ORGANS THERE, So They Say
    by Lesli Taylor M.D. and Adah Maurer Ph.D.

    Most compelling of all reasons to abandon this worst of all bad habits is the fact that buttock-battering can be unintentional sexual abuse for some children. There is an abundance of educational resources, testimony. documentation, etc available on the subject that can easily be found by doing a little research with the recommended reads at www.nospank.net.

    Just a handful of those helping to raise awareness of why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea:

    American Academy of Pediatrics,
    American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,
    Center For Effective Discipline,
    PsycHealth Ltd Behavioral Health Professionals,
    Churches' Network For Non-Violence,
    Nobel Peace Prize recipient Archbishop Desmond Tutu,
    Parenting In Jesus' Footsteps,
    Global Initiative To End All Corporal Punishment of Children,
    United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

    In 26 countries, child corporal punishment is prohibited by law (with more in process). In fact, the US was the only UN member that did not ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

    Posted by Mino D on 10/14/2009 @ 04:13AM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author
mike @change.org

Mike Smith is associate editor at Change.org. Email: mike@change.org

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.