Charters Erase Achievement Gap through Innovative ... Cheating
Published June 10, 2009 @ 07:38PM PT

Three cheers for this charter school network's silver bullet to erase the achievement gap: cheat on the standardized tests. Or so the evidence suggests:
In the past, parents languished on waiting lists before enrolling their kids in Hernandez's [Cesar Chavez Network] schools. Regularly recognized for excellence in serving mostly low-income kids, Hernandez's schools earned a nod from President George W. Bush in 2007 for "closing the achievement gap." The Chavez network was considered innovative, even inspiring.
Is it? Here are some things to consider before enrolling your kid.
Possible CSAP abuses
Cesar Chavez schools in Pueblo are part of Pueblo City Schools (PCS). Elsewhere, they're members of the Colorado Charter School Institute. All of them, like most public schools, are assessed to a large degree on students' test scores.
Robert Vise, PCS executive director of assessment and technology, says he stumbled upon some eyebrow-raising information regarding the 2008 Colorado Student Assessment Program (CSAP) test scores at Pueblo's Cesar Chavez Academy. According to data Vise received from the state, more than 60 percent of the Academy's 684 third- through eighth-grade students were given special accommodations for the test, such as extra time to complete it. These accommodations normally are afforded only to children with established physical or developmental disabilities.
All 220 students in fourth and fifth grades were given special accommodations in the test's reading portion, Vise says, and all but two also received special accommodations on the math portion.
"I've never had a whole grade level at a school have accommodations," Vise says.
The figures were jarring, particularly because Vise's own records suggested a small fraction of the children had qualifying disabilities, and a significant number were actually classified as being "gifted."
[....] In 2005, [John] Brainard, then the Pueblo district's director of assessment and research, documented four phone calls from concerned parents of CCA third-graders, all relating the same story: Their children said CCA staff had brought them into a "CSAP review" following the test, and encouraged them to change some answers.
Along with staff from CTB-McGraw-Hill, CSAP's creators, Brainard was allowed to examine written answers on CSAP reading tests for Chavez's third-graders. Although no one ever accused the Chavez kids of cheating, significant erasures or changes were found in 62 percent of the tests, and some new answers appeared to be done in different handwriting.
Despite the evidence, the test results were never revised. (Read the rest...)
Silly Colorado. Instead of cheating to boost test scores, they could boost them honestly, a la New York, by dumbing down their state tests.
Oh never mind. As Joel Klein and Arne Duncan never tire of telling us, the fact that parents are on waiting lists to get their kids into these schools is proof not of their successful and highly-financed marketing campaigns, but of their quality.
(h/t Susan Ohanion)
Photo by Mr_Stein
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Core Knowledge and Class Size
-
Sweden's "Free Schools" Incentivize Innovation, Better Prepare Kids for Future
-
Pharmer's Market: The Cost of Producing "Successful" Students
Comments (5)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















The evidence of cheating certainly is troubling. Even more troubling is the fact that we lack reliable measures to judge the quality of public schools, whether charter or traditional.
A recent Harvard study found evidence of minimal cognitive demand in high-performing Massachusetts charter schools. The authors attributed the lack of intellectual ambition to the incentives created by state assessments.
Of course, this problem is not at all limited to charters. Without a richer assessment system, it's difficult to identify the kinds of practices that produce the outcomes we really want
Posted by Claus von Zastrow on 06/11/2009 @ 03:59AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
It's hard to take this blog seriously with it's almost blind bias against charter schools.
Posted by Ty Cole on 06/12/2009 @ 09:10AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
And it's hard to take the mainstream media (and the DoE) seriously with their almost blind bias for them.
Call it an alternative point of view, Ty. And then tell me how not to take seriously the investigation into a Bush-lauded charter that, according to the govt and the media, "erased the achievement gap."
It's no fun banging this drum, I assure you. If you want the pro-charter argument, you have many options, from WaPo to the NYTimes.
And you also have "the case for charters" series by a guest-blogger here, as well as an occasional mention of charters that seem praise-worthy even by me.
I see charters as the educational equivalent of the "no public option" camp in the health care reform debate. Corporate, mis-guided, and politically and economically suspect.
Posted by Clay Burell on 06/12/2009 @ 02:23PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
And, yet, let's give those parents who choose charters a little more credit. At least some of us are able to think for ourselves; at least some children benefit when their parents have a choice.
Speaking of choice, "Corporate, mis-guided, and politically and economically suspect" applies, as well, to the growing monopoly that Reform Math programs are wielding over our schools. Imho, anything that offers an alternative to what mathematicians around the country have deemed a sorely inadequate approach to mathematics education is a darn good thing.
Posted by Katharine Beals on 06/16/2009 @ 10:42AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Cheating is a problem, but you don't need teachers to help do it (see: http://higher-ed-reform.blogspot.com/2009/09/cheating-part-2.html). These kids broke into a school to steal some exams. This is how bad it is today.
Posted by Sam Slazony on 09/13/2009 @ 08:18PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.